A card driver may declare support for computing the padding on the card,
or else the padding will be applied locally in padding.c. All five
PKCS11 PSS mechanisms are supported, for signature and verification.
There are a few limits on what we choose to support, in particular I
don't see a need for arbitrary combinations of MGF hash, data hash, and
salt length, so I've restricted it (for the user's benefit) to the only
cases that really matter, where salt_len = hash_len and the same hash is
used for the MGF and data hashing.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reworked and extended in 2018 by Jakub Jelen <jjelen@redhat.com> against
current OpenSC master, to actually work with existing PIV cards:
* extended of missing mechanisms (SHA224, possibility to select MGF1)
* compatibility with OpenSSL 1.1+
* Removed the ANSI padding
* Formatting cleanup, error checking
Based on the original work from
https://github.com/NWilson/OpenSC/commit/42f3199e66
Signed-off-by: Jakub Jelen <jjelen@redhat.com>
As most of the drivers do not modify these, we can mark them as const.
Two drivers that we cannot convert are dnie and masktech.
section size
.data 35232 -> 25472
.data.rel.ro 36928 -> 46688
ATR and differences between 3.4/3.5 are based on
https://github.com/CardContact/sc-hsm-embedded
Actually, 3.5 is untested, but 3.4 is almost identical, so we hope that
for 3.5 everything is fine.
Since "Add GCC format checking attributes to log functions" commit GCC
warns us about problems with format strings and their arguments provided
to OpenSC message logging functions.
This commit fixes all cases where GCC warned about incorrect format on
64-bit Linux, 32-bit and 64-bit mingw builds (with SM and OpenSSL enabled).
Well, almost all since on mingw GCC does not recognize "ll" size specifier
(present at least since Visual Studio 2005, also in mingw own CRT) so these
(few) warnings about it remain.
In most cases format size specifier for size_t type was missing (usually
size was left at default int level, with is different on 64-bit x86).
Some formats had too few / too many arguments.
In some cases pointers were printed as integers.
Some long variables were missing "l" prefix (especially with regard to %x
format).
Signed-off-by: Maciej S. Szmigiero <mail@maciej.szmigiero.name>
card-starcos.c:657:5: warning: Value stored to 'p' is never read
*p++ = file->record_length & 0xff;
^~~
card-starcos.c:652:5: warning: Value stored to 'p' is never read
*p++ = file->record_length & 0xff;
^~~
card-starcos.c:647:5: warning: Value stored to 'p' is never read
*p++ = file->size & 0xff;
^~~
card-starcos.c:609:4: warning: Value stored to 'p' is never read
*p++ = tmp; /* SM ISF */
^~~
card-starcos.c:572:4: warning: Value stored to 'p' is never read
*p++ = tmp;
^~~
card-starcos.c:1024:2: warning: Value stored to 'keyID' is never read
keyID = env->key_ref[0];
^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
git-svn-id: https://www.opensc-project.org/svnp/opensc/trunk@5166 c6295689-39f2-0310-b995-f0e70906c6a9
add 'current_ef' and 'current_df' member to 'sc_card_cache'.
The main purpose of this is to reduce number of APDU transactions.
git-svn-id: https://www.opensc-project.org/svnp/opensc/trunk@5002 c6295689-39f2-0310-b995-f0e70906c6a9
From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malloc#Casting_and_type_safety
" Casting and type safety
malloc returns a void pointer (void *), which indicates that it is a
pointer to a region of unknown data type. One may "cast" (see type
conversion) this pointer to a specific type, as in
int *ptr = (int*)malloc(10 * sizeof (int));
When using C, this is considered bad practice; it is redundant under the
C standard. Moreover, putting in a cast may mask failure to include the
header stdlib.h, in which the prototype for malloc is found. In the
absence of a prototype for malloc, the C compiler will assume that
malloc returns an int, and will issue a warning in a context such as the
above, provided the error is not masked by a cast. On certain
architectures and data models (such as LP64 on 64 bit systems, where
long and pointers are 64 bit and int is 32 bit), this error can actually
result in undefined behavior, as the implicitly declared malloc returns
a 32 bit value whereas the actually defined function returns a 64 bit
value. Depending on calling conventions and memory layout, this may
result in stack smashing.
The returned pointer need not be explicitly cast to a more specific
pointer type, since ANSI C defines an implicit conversion between the
void pointer type and other pointers to objects. An explicit cast of
malloc's return value is sometimes performed because malloc originally
returned a char *, but this cast is unnecessary in standard C
code.[4][5] Omitting the cast, however, creates an incompatibility with
C++, which does require it.
The lack of a specific pointer type returned from malloc is type-unsafe
behaviour: malloc allocates based on byte count but not on type. This
distinguishes it from the C++ new operator that returns a pointer whose
type relies on the operand. (see C Type Safety). "
See also
http://www.opensc-project.org/pipermail/opensc-devel/2010-August/014586.html
git-svn-id: https://www.opensc-project.org/svnp/opensc/trunk@4636 c6295689-39f2-0310-b995-f0e70906c6a9
* reduce to a few, supported functions.
* change all functions to take the debug level as parameter.
* use symbolic names for the debug levels.
* fix tools to pass "verbose"/"opt_debug" as ctx->debug.
git-svn-id: https://www.opensc-project.org/svnp/opensc/trunk@4118 c6295689-39f2-0310-b995-f0e70906c6a9
dojo
Frank Morgner
Andreas Kemnade
Nicholas Wilson
Priit Laes
Peter Marschall
Maciej S. Szmigiero
Frank Morgner
Joachim Bauch
martin
andre
ludovic.rousseau
vtarasov
aj