Since "Add GCC format checking attributes to log functions" commit GCC
warns us about problems with format strings and their arguments provided
to OpenSC message logging functions.
This commit fixes all cases where GCC warned about incorrect format on
64-bit Linux, 32-bit and 64-bit mingw builds (with SM and OpenSSL enabled).
Well, almost all since on mingw GCC does not recognize "ll" size specifier
(present at least since Visual Studio 2005, also in mingw own CRT) so these
(few) warnings about it remain.
In most cases format size specifier for size_t type was missing (usually
size was left at default int level, with is different on 64-bit x86).
Some formats had too few / too many arguments.
In some cases pointers were printed as integers.
Some long variables were missing "l" prefix (especially with regard to %x
format).
Signed-off-by: Maciej S. Szmigiero <mail@maciej.szmigiero.name>
... as required by PKCS#11 2.30, if the application doesn't call
`C_GetSlotList` with `NULL`.
Fixes ghost tokens in Firefox when detaching a reader that contained a
card.
Fixes https://github.com/OpenSC/OpenSC/issues/629
* Add configure-time dependency on pcsclite (required version from comments in reader-pcsc.c)
* The functionality is already supported in PCSC-Lite
* For older PCSC-Lite versions still return CKR_FUNCTION_NOT_SUPPORTED
# closes#899
This is name change only fix.
The variable name "card" was being used to refer to a struct sc_card or a struct sc_pkcs11_card
in some files including sc_pkcs11.h. In other files the variable name "p11card" is used for struct sc_pkcs11_card.
This creates hard to read code, such as: slot->card->card.
All definitations of sc_pkcs11_card *card now use p11card as the variable name.
Fix#471
to prepare future enhancements and in the sake of uniformity
in 'struct sc_pkcs11_framework_ops'
the 'struct sc_pkcs11_card' argument of 'init_token' handler is changed for 'struct sc_pkcs11_slot'
coding style issues
The list of slots returned by C_GetSlotList() contains:
- if present, virtual hotplug slot;
- any slot with token;
- without token(s), one empty slot per reader;
git-svn-id: https://www.opensc-project.org/svnp/opensc/trunk@5421 c6295689-39f2-0310-b995-f0e70906c6a9
* Detect different cards based on ATR-s and on card objects
* Set the card name from the ATR table
* Conditionally add support for 2048b keys
* Add workarounds for broken MULTOS and JavaCard cards.
git-svn-id: https://www.opensc-project.org/svnp/opensc/trunk@4893 c6295689-39f2-0310-b995-f0e70906c6a9
From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malloc#Casting_and_type_safety
" Casting and type safety
malloc returns a void pointer (void *), which indicates that it is a
pointer to a region of unknown data type. One may "cast" (see type
conversion) this pointer to a specific type, as in
int *ptr = (int*)malloc(10 * sizeof (int));
When using C, this is considered bad practice; it is redundant under the
C standard. Moreover, putting in a cast may mask failure to include the
header stdlib.h, in which the prototype for malloc is found. In the
absence of a prototype for malloc, the C compiler will assume that
malloc returns an int, and will issue a warning in a context such as the
above, provided the error is not masked by a cast. On certain
architectures and data models (such as LP64 on 64 bit systems, where
long and pointers are 64 bit and int is 32 bit), this error can actually
result in undefined behavior, as the implicitly declared malloc returns
a 32 bit value whereas the actually defined function returns a 64 bit
value. Depending on calling conventions and memory layout, this may
result in stack smashing.
The returned pointer need not be explicitly cast to a more specific
pointer type, since ANSI C defines an implicit conversion between the
void pointer type and other pointers to objects. An explicit cast of
malloc's return value is sometimes performed because malloc originally
returned a char *, but this cast is unnecessary in standard C
code.[4][5] Omitting the cast, however, creates an incompatibility with
C++, which does require it.
The lack of a specific pointer type returned from malloc is type-unsafe
behaviour: malloc allocates based on byte count but not on type. This
distinguishes it from the C++ new operator that returns a pointer whose
type relies on the operand. (see C Type Safety). "
See also
http://www.opensc-project.org/pipermail/opensc-devel/2010-August/014586.html
git-svn-id: https://www.opensc-project.org/svnp/opensc/trunk@4636 c6295689-39f2-0310-b995-f0e70906c6a9